Fleet and Freight Management Center --> Freight Equipment:
freight monitoring parameters
Definitions
freight monitoring parameters (Information Flow): Parameters to configure the Freight Equipment for event reporting and keep alive functions.
Fleet and Freight Management Center (Source Physical Object): The 'Fleet and Freight Management Center' provides the capability for commercial drivers and fleet-freight managers to receive real-time routing information and access databases containing vehicle and/or freight equipment locations as well as carrier, vehicle, freight equipment and driver information. The 'Fleet and Freight Management Center' also provides the capability for fleet managers to monitor the safety and security of their commercial vehicle drivers and fleet.
Freight Equipment (Destination Physical Object): 'Freight Equipment' represents a freight container, intermodal chassis, or trailer and provides sensory, processing, storage, and communications functions necessary to support safe, secure and efficient freight operations. It provides equipment safety data and status and can alert the appropriate systems of an incident, breach, or tamper event. It also provides accurate position information to support in-transit visibility of freight equipment.
Included In
This Triple is in the following Service Packages:
This triple is associated with the following Functional Objects:
This Triple is described by the following Functional View Data Flows:
This Triple has the following triple relationships:
None |
Communication Solutions
- (None-Data) - Secure Wireless Internet (EU) (43)
- (None-Data) - Secure Wireless Internet (ITS) (43)
- (None-Data) - Apache Kafka over Wireless (44)
- (None-Data) - OMG DDS over Wireless (44)
- (None-Data) - OASIS MQTT over Wireless (50)
- (None-Data) - OASIS AMQP over Wireless (61)
Selected Solution
Solution Description
ITS Application Entity
Development needed |
Click gap icons for more info.
|
||
Mgmt
OASIS MQTT DMP |
Facilities
Development needed OASIS MQTT |
Security
|
|
TransNet
|
|||
Access
|
Note that some layers might have alternatives, in which case all of the gap icons associated with every alternative may be shown on the diagram, but the solution severity calculations (and resulting ordering of solutions) includes only the issues associated with the default (i.e., best, least severe) alternative.
Characteristics
Characteristic | Value |
---|---|
Time Context | Recent |
Spatial Context | Regional |
Acknowledgement | True |
Cardinality | Unicast |
Initiator | Destination |
Authenticable | True |
Encrypt | True |
Interoperability | Description |
---|---|
Local | In cases where an interface is normally encapsulated by a single stakeholder, interoperability is still desirable, but the motive is vendor independence and the efficiencies and choices that an open standards-based interface provides. |
Security
Information Flow Security | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability | ||
Rating | Moderate | Moderate | Low | |
Basis | Could contain information indicating the type of cargo, so should be protected from observation that would betray sensitive cargo contents. | Should be correct to ensure accurate and consistent monitoring. | Probably will not need to be changed often. |
Security Characteristics | Value |
---|---|
Authenticable | True |
Encrypt | True |