TM13: Standard Railroad Grade Crossing
This service package manages highway traffic at highway-rail intersections (HRIs) where operational requirements do not dictate more advanced features (e.g., where rail operational speeds are less than 80 miles per hour). Both passive (e.g., the crossbuck sign) and active warning systems (e.g., flashing lights and gates) are supported. (Note that passive systems exercise only the single interface between the ITS Roadway Equipment and the Driver in the physical view.) These traditional HRI warning systems may also be augmented with other standard traffic management devices. The warning systems are activated on notification of an approaching train by interfaced wayside equipment. The equipment at the HRI may also be interconnected with adjacent signalized intersections so that local control can be adapted to highway-rail intersection activities. Health monitoring of the HRI equipment and interfaces is performed; detected abnormalities are reported to both highway and railroad officials through wayside interfaces and interfaces to the Traffic Management Center.
Relevant Regions: Australia, Canada, European Union, and United States
- Enterprise
- Functional
- Physical
- Goals and Objectives
- Needs and Requirements
- Sources
- Security
- Standards
- System Requirements
Enterprise
Development Stage Roles and Relationships
Installation Stage Roles and Relationships
Operations and Maintenance Stage Roles and Relationships
(hide)
Source | Destination | Role/Relationship |
---|---|---|
ITS Roadway Equipment Maintainer | ITS Roadway Equipment | Maintains |
ITS Roadway Equipment Manager | ITS Roadway Equipment | Manages |
ITS Roadway Equipment Owner | ITS Roadway Equipment Maintainer | System Maintenance Agreement |
ITS Roadway Equipment Owner | ITS Roadway Equipment Manager | Operations Agreement |
ITS Roadway Equipment Owner | Other ITS Roadway Equipment Maintainer | Maintenance Data Exchange Agreement |
ITS Roadway Equipment Owner | Other ITS Roadway Equipment Owner | Information Exchange and Action Agreement |
ITS Roadway Equipment Owner | Other ITS Roadway Equipment User | Service Usage Agreement |
ITS Roadway Equipment Owner | Traffic Management Center Maintainer | Maintenance Data Exchange Agreement |
ITS Roadway Equipment Owner | Traffic Management Center Owner | Information Exchange and Action Agreement |
ITS Roadway Equipment Owner | Traffic Management Center User | Service Usage Agreement |
ITS Roadway Equipment Owner | Wayside Equipment Maintainer | Maintenance Data Exchange Agreement |
ITS Roadway Equipment Owner | Wayside Equipment Owner | Information Exchange and Action Agreement |
ITS Roadway Equipment Owner | Wayside Equipment User | Service Usage Agreement |
ITS Roadway Equipment Supplier | ITS Roadway Equipment Owner | Warranty |
Other ITS Roadway Equipment Maintainer | Other ITS Roadway Equipment | Maintains |
Other ITS Roadway Equipment Manager | Other ITS Roadway Equipment | Manages |
Other ITS Roadway Equipment Owner | ITS Roadway Equipment Maintainer | Maintenance Data Exchange Agreement |
Other ITS Roadway Equipment Owner | ITS Roadway Equipment Owner | Information Exchange and Action Agreement |
Other ITS Roadway Equipment Owner | ITS Roadway Equipment User | Service Usage Agreement |
Other ITS Roadway Equipment Owner | Other ITS Roadway Equipment Maintainer | System Maintenance Agreement |
Other ITS Roadway Equipment Owner | Other ITS Roadway Equipment Manager | Operations Agreement |
Other ITS Roadway Equipment Supplier | Other ITS Roadway Equipment Owner | Warranty |
Rail Operations Center Maintainer | Rail Operations Center | Maintains |
Rail Operations Center Manager | Rail Operations Center | Manages |
Rail Operations Center Owner | Rail Operations Center Maintainer | System Maintenance Agreement |
Rail Operations Center Owner | Rail Operations Center Manager | Operations Agreement |
Rail Operations Center Supplier | Rail Operations Center Owner | Warranty |
Traffic Management Center Maintainer | Traffic Management Center | Maintains |
Traffic Management Center Manager | Traffic Management Center | Manages |
Traffic Management Center Owner | ITS Roadway Equipment Maintainer | Maintenance Data Exchange Agreement |
Traffic Management Center Owner | ITS Roadway Equipment Owner | Information Provision Agreement |
Traffic Management Center Owner | ITS Roadway Equipment User | Service Usage Agreement |
Traffic Management Center Owner | Rail Operations Center Maintainer | Maintenance Data Exchange Agreement |
Traffic Management Center Owner | Rail Operations Center Owner | Information Provision Agreement |
Traffic Management Center Owner | Rail Operations Center User | Service Usage Agreement |
Traffic Management Center Owner | Traffic Management Center Maintainer | System Maintenance Agreement |
Traffic Management Center Owner | Traffic Management Center Manager | Operations Agreement |
Traffic Management Center Supplier | Traffic Management Center Owner | Warranty |
Wayside Equipment Maintainer | Wayside Equipment | Maintains |
Wayside Equipment Manager | Wayside Equipment | Manages |
Wayside Equipment Owner | ITS Roadway Equipment Maintainer | Maintenance Data Exchange Agreement |
Wayside Equipment Owner | ITS Roadway Equipment Owner | Information Exchange and Action Agreement |
Wayside Equipment Owner | ITS Roadway Equipment User | Service Usage Agreement |
Wayside Equipment Owner | Wayside Equipment Maintainer | System Maintenance Agreement |
Wayside Equipment Owner | Wayside Equipment Manager | Operations Agreement |
Wayside Equipment Supplier | Wayside Equipment Owner | Warranty |
Functional
This service package includes the following Functional View PSpecs:
Physical
The physical diagram can be viewed in SVG or PNG format and the current format is SVG.SVG Diagram
PNG Diagram
Includes Physical Objects:
Physical Object | Class | Description |
---|---|---|
Driver | Vehicle | The 'Driver' represents the person that operates a vehicle on the roadway. Included are operators of private, transit, commercial, and emergency vehicles where the interactions are not particular to the type of vehicle (e.g., interactions supporting vehicle safety applications). The Driver originates driver requests and receives driver information that reflects the interactions which might be useful to all drivers, regardless of vehicle classification. Information and interactions which are unique to drivers of a specific vehicle type (e.g., fleet interactions with transit, commercial, or emergency vehicle drivers) are covered by separate objects. |
ITS Roadway Equipment | Field | 'ITS Roadway Equipment' represents the ITS equipment that is distributed on and along the roadway that monitors and controls traffic and monitors and manages the roadway. This physical object includes traffic detectors, environmental sensors, traffic signals, highway advisory radios, dynamic message signs, CCTV cameras and video image processing systems, grade crossing warning systems, and ramp metering systems. Lane management systems and barrier systems that control access to transportation infrastructure such as roadways, bridges and tunnels are also included. This object also provides environmental monitoring including sensors that measure road conditions, surface weather, and vehicle emissions. Work zone systems including work zone surveillance, traffic control, driver warning, and work crew safety systems are also included. |
MMV User | Personal | The 'MMV User' represents the person that operates a micromobility vehicle (MMV). Included are cyclists and operators of other low-powered mobility devices such as e-scooters, powered wheelchairs, and power assisted bicycles where the interactions are not particular to the type of vehicle (e.g., interactions supporting vehicle safety applications). The MMV User participates in ITS services that support safe, shared use of the transportation network by motorized and non-motorized transportation modes. Representing those using non-motorized travel modes, and in particular bicyclists that sometimes share motor vehicle lanes, these MMV users provide input (e.g. a call signal requesting right of way at an intersection) and may be detected by ITS services to improve safety. The MMV User originates requests and receives information that reflects the interactions which might be useful to all users, regardless of vehicle type. |
Other ITS Roadway Equipment | Field | Representing another set of ITS Roadway Equipment, 'Other ITS Roadway Equipment' supports 'field device' to 'field device' communication and coordination, and provides a source and destination for information that may be exchanged between ITS Roadway Equipment. The interface enables direct coordination between field equipment. Examples include the direct interface between sensors and other roadway devices (e.g., Dynamic Message Signs) and the direct interface between roadway devices (e.g., between a Signal System Master and Signal System Local equipment) or a connection between an arterial signal system master and a ramp meter controller. |
Pedestrian | Personal | The 'Pedestrian' represents a person traveling on foot. Pedestrians participate in ITS services that support safe, shared use of the transportation network. Included are visually impaired travelers who travel through portions of the transportation network and interact with ITS systems. They provide input (e.g. a call signal requesting right of way at an intersection) and may be detected by ITS services to improve safety |
Rail Operations Center | Center | 'Rail Operations Center' represents the (usually) centralized control point for a substantial segment of a freight railroad's operations and maintenance activities. It is roughly the railroad equivalent to a highway Traffic Management Center. It is the source and destination of information that can be used to coordinate rail and highway traffic management and maintenance operations. It is also the source and destination for incident, incident response, disaster, or evacuation information that is exchanged with an Emergency Management Center. The use of a single object for multiple sources and destination for information exchange with railroads implies the need for a single, consistent interface between a given railroad's operations and maintenance activities and ITS. |
Traffic Management Center | Center | The 'Traffic Management Center' monitors and controls traffic and the road network. It represents centers that manage a broad range of transportation facilities including freeway systems, rural and suburban highway systems, and urban and suburban traffic control systems. It communicates with ITS Roadway Equipment and Connected Vehicle Roadside Equipment (RSE) to monitor and manage traffic flow and monitor the condition of the roadway, surrounding environmental conditions, and field equipment status. It manages traffic and transportation resources to support allied agencies in responding to, and recovering from, incidents ranging from minor traffic incidents through major disasters. |
Wayside Equipment | Field | 'Wayside Equipment' represents train interface equipment (usually) maintained and operated by the railroad and (usually) physically located at or near a grade crossing. It is a source and destination for information for, or about, approaching trains and their crews (e.g. the time at which the train will arrive and the time it will take to clear a crossing, crossing status or warnings, etc.). Generally one wayside equipment interface would be associated with one highway rail intersection. However, multiple crossings may be controlled using information based on data from one wayside equipment interface. |
Includes Functional Objects:
Functional Object | Description | Physical Object |
---|---|---|
Roadway Basic Surveillance | 'Roadway Basic Surveillance' monitors traffic conditions using fixed equipment such as loop detectors and CCTV cameras. | ITS Roadway Equipment |
Roadway Signal Control | 'Roadway Signal Control' includes the field elements that monitor and control signalized intersections. It includes the traffic signal controllers, detectors, conflict monitors, signal heads, and other ancillary equipment that supports traffic signal control. It also includes field masters, and equipment that supports communications with a central monitoring and/or control system, as applicable. The communications link supports upload and download of signal timings and other parameters and reporting of current intersection status. It represents the field equipment used in all levels of traffic signal control from basic actuated systems that operate on fixed timing plans through adaptive systems. It also supports all signalized intersection configurations, including those that accommodate pedestrians. In advanced, future implementations, environmental data may be monitored and used to support dilemma zone processing and other aspects of signal control that are sensitive to local environmental conditions. | ITS Roadway Equipment |
Roadway Standard Rail Crossing | 'Roadway Standard Rail Crossing' manages highway traffic at highway-rail intersections (HRIs) where operational requirements do not dictate advanced features (e.g., where rail operational speeds are less than 80 miles per hour). Either passive (e.g., the crossbuck sign) or active warning systems (e.g., flashing lights and gates) are supported depending on the specific requirements for each intersection. These traditional HRI warning systems may also be augmented with other standard traffic management devices. The warning systems are activated on notification of an approaching train by interfaced wayside equipment. The equipment at the HRI may also be interconnected with adjacent signalized intersections so that local control can be adapted to highway-rail intersection activities. Health monitoring of the HRI equipment and interfaces is performed; detected abnormalities are reported through interfaces to the wayside interface equipment and the Traffic Management Center. | ITS Roadway Equipment |
TMC Basic Surveillance | 'TMC Basic Surveillance' remotely monitors and controls traffic sensor systems and surveillance (e.g., CCTV) equipment, and collects, processes and stores the collected traffic data. Current traffic information and other real-time transportation information is also collected from other centers. The collected information is provided to traffic operations personnel and made available to other centers. | Traffic Management Center |
TMC Signal Control | 'TMC Signal Control' provides the capability for traffic managers to monitor and manage the traffic flow at signalized intersections. This capability includes analyzing and reducing the collected data from traffic surveillance equipment and developing and implementing control plans for signalized intersections. Control plans may be developed and implemented that coordinate signals at many intersections under the domain of a single Traffic Management Center and are responsive to traffic conditions and adapt to support incidents, preemption and priority requests, pedestrian crossing calls, etc. | Traffic Management Center |
TMC Standard Rail Crossing Management | 'TMC Standard Rail Crossing Management' monitors and controls rail crossing traffic control equipment. This version provides basic support for standard active warning systems at grade crossings. It remotely monitors and reports the status of the rail crossing equipment and sends control plan updates to the equipment. | Traffic Management Center |
Includes Information Flows:
Information Flow | Description |
---|---|
crossing call | Non-motorized user request to cross the roadway. This is an overt request from a pedestrian, micromobility vehicle user (e.g., cyclist), or other vulnerable road user. This overt request may be a physical button push or hovering or gesturing in the vicinity of the button that supports contactless activation. |
crossing permission | Information provided to guide and warn pedestrians, micromobility vehicle users (e.g., cyclists), and other crosswalk users. It includes crossing request acknowledgment, current crossing permission, crossing time remaining, and real-time warnings of safety threats. |
driver information | Regulatory, warning, guidance, and other information provided to the driver to support safe and efficient vehicle operation. |
rail crossing advisories | Notification of Highway-Rail Intersection equipment failure, intersection blockage, or other condition requiring attention, and maintenance activities at or near highway rail intersections. |
rail crossing control data | Data required for HRI information transmitted at railroad grade crossings and within railroad operations. |
rail crossing operational status | Status of the highway-rail grade crossing equipment including both the current state or mode of operation and the current equipment condition. |
rail crossing request | A request for highway-rail intersection status or a specific control request intended to modify HRI operation. |
rail crossing status | Status of the highway-rail intersection equipment including both the current state or mode of operation and the current equipment condition. |
right-of-way request coordination | The direct flow of information between field equipment. This includes notification of crossing calls from pedestrians and other vulnerable road users and requests for signal prioritization or preemption, and any other request for right-of-way at an intersection. The status of the request is also shared. For vulnerable road users, this includes information provided to guide and warn vulnerable road users at crossings including crossing permission status and crossing time remaining. |
right-of-way request notification | Notice that a request has occurred for signal prioritization, signal preemption, pedestrian call, multi-modal crossing activation, or other source for right-of-way. |
signal control commands | Control of traffic signal controllers or field masters including clock synchronization. |
signal control coordination | The direct flow of information between field equipment. This includes configuration and control of traffic signal controllers or field masters. Configuration data and operational status of traffic signal control equipment including operating condition and current indications are returned. |
signal control status | Operational and status data of traffic signal control equipment including operating condition and current indications. |
track status | Current status of the wayside equipment and notification of an arriving train. |
traffic detector control | Information used to configure and control traffic detector systems such as inductive loop detectors and machine vision sensors. |
traffic detector coordination | The direct flow of information between field equipment. This includes information used to configure and control traffic detector systems such as inductive loop detectors and machine vision sensors Raw and/or processed traffic detector data is returned that allows derivation of traffic flow variables (e.g., speed, volume, and density measures) and associated information (e.g., congestion, potential incidents). This flow includes the traffic data and the operational status of the traffic detectors |
traffic detector data | Raw and/or processed traffic detector data which allows derivation of traffic flow variables (e.g., speed, volume, and density measures) and associated information (e.g., congestion, potential incidents). This flow includes the traffic data and the operational status of the traffic detectors |
traffic image meta data | Meta data that describes traffic images. Traffic images (video) are in another flow. |
traffic images | High fidelity, real-time traffic images suitable for surveillance monitoring by the operator or for use in machine vision applications. This flow includes the images. Meta data that describes the images is contained in another flow. |
video surveillance control | Information used to configure and control video surveillance systems. |
video surveillance coordination | The direct flow of information between field equipment. This includes information used to configure and control video surveillance systems and the high fidelity, real-time traffic images and associated meta data that are returned. |
Goals and Objectives
Associated Planning Factors and Goals
Planning Factor | Goal |
---|---|
B. Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users; | Reduce fatalities and injuries |
Associated Objective Categories
Objective Category |
---|
Safety: Vehicle Crashes and Fatalities |
Associated Objectives and Performance Measures
Needs and Requirements
Need | Functional Object | Requirement | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
01 | Traffic Operations need to be able to warn drivers of crossing closures in time for the driver to take appropriate action. | Roadway Standard Rail Crossing | 04 | The field element shall receive track status from the rail wayside equipment that can be passed on to the traffic management center. This may include the current status of the tracks and whether a train is approaching. |
06 | The field element shall control the dynamic message signs (DMS) in the vicinity of a highway-rail intersection (HRI) to advise drivers, cyclists, and pedestrians of approaching trains. | |||
09 | The field element shall forward rail traffic advisories received from the Wayside Equipment to the traffic management center. | |||
02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. | Roadway Basic Surveillance | 01 | The field element shall collect, process, digitize, and send traffic sensor data (speed, volume, and occupancy) to the center for further analysis and storage, under center control. |
02 | The field element shall collect, process, and send traffic images to the center for further analysis and distribution. | |||
04 | The field element shall return sensor and CCTV system operational status to the controlling center. | |||
Roadway Signal Control | 01 | The field element shall implement pre-preemption adjustments to signal timing when notified of preemption status changes at adjacent intersections. | ||
01 | The field element shall control traffic signals under center control. | |||
02 | The field element shall respond to pedestrian crossing requests by accommodating the pedestrian crossing. | |||
03 | The field element shall provide the capability to notify the traffic management center of pedestrian calls and pedestrian accommodations. | |||
04 | The field element shall report the current signal control information to the center. | |||
05 | The field element shall report current preemption status to the center. | |||
06 | The field element shall return traffic signal controller operational status to the center. | |||
15 | The field element shall receive requests for signal preemption. | |||
Roadway Standard Rail Crossing | 01 | The field element shall collect and process, traffic sensor data in the vicinity of a highway-rail intersection (HRI). | ||
02 | The field element shall monitor the status of the highway-rail intersection (HRI) equipment, including both the current state and mode of operation and the current equipment condition, to be forwarded on to the traffic management center. | |||
03 | The field element shall monitor the status of the highway-rail intersection (HRI) equipment, including both the current state and mode of operation and the current equipment condition, to be forwarded on to the rail wayside equipment. | |||
05 | The field element shall collect pedestrian images and pedestrian sensor data, and respond to pedestrian crossing requests via display, audio signal, or other manner. | |||
07 | The field element shall close the highway-rail intersection (HRI) when a train is approaching using gates, lights/signs, barriers, and traffic control signals. | |||
08 | The field element shall support the integrated control of adjacent traffic signals to clear an area in advance of an approaching train and to manage traffic around the intersection. | |||
TMC Basic Surveillance | 02 | The center shall monitor, analyze, and distribute traffic images from CCTV systems under remote control of the center. | ||
TMC Signal Control | 01 | The center shall remotely control traffic signal controllers. | ||
01 | The center shall implement pre-preemption adjustments to signal timing at adjacent intersections to accommodate a signal preemption. | |||
02 | The center shall accept notifications of pedestrian calls. | |||
03 | The center shall collect traffic signal controller operational status and compare against the control information sent by the center. | |||
05 | The center shall manage (define, store and modify) control plans to coordinate signalized intersections, to be engaged at the direction of center personnel or according to a daily schedule. | |||
06 | The center shall implement control plans to coordinate signalized intersections based on data from sensors. | |||
08 | The center shall maintain traffic signal coordination including synchronizing clocks throughout the system. | |||
10 | The center shall adjust signal timing in response to a signal prioritization, signal preemption, pedestrian call, multi-modal crossing activation, or other requests for right-of-way. | |||
TMC Standard Rail Crossing Management | 01 | The center shall collect highway-rail intersection (HRI) equipment operational status including both the current state or mode of operation and the current equipment condition. |
Security
In order to participate in this service package, each physical object should meet or exceed the following security levels.
Physical Object Security | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Physical Object | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability | Security Class |
ITS Roadway Equipment | Moderate | High | Moderate | Class 3 |
Other ITS Roadway Equipment | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Class 2 |
Rail Operations Center | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Class 2 |
Traffic Management Center | Moderate | High | Moderate | Class 3 |
Wayside Equipment | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Class 2 |
In order to participate in this service package, each information flow triple should meet or exceed the following security levels.
Information Flow Security | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Source | Destination | Information Flow | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
Basis | Basis | Basis | |||
ITS Roadway Equipment | Driver | driver information | Not Applicable | High | Moderate |
This data is sent to all drivers and is also directly observable, by design. | This is the primary signal trusted by the driver to decide whether to go through the intersection and what speed to go through the intersection at; if it's wrong, accidents could happen. | If the lights are out you have to get a policeman to direct traffic – expensive and inefficient and may cause a cascading effect due to lack of coordination with other intersections. | |||
ITS Roadway Equipment | MMV User | crossing permission | Not Applicable | High | Low |
This data is intentionally transmitted to everyone via a broadcast. | Although pedestrians have a responsibility to make sure the road is safe before they cross, they may react instinctively to incorrect information and be led to cross at unsafe times if they get incorrect information. Also, if the traffic signals are wrong and an accident happens, the pedestrian involved could sue, causing financial loss and other undesirable outcomes. | It is easy to tell whether this information flow is available and pedestrians are used to using crosswalks that do not provide this service. | |||
ITS Roadway Equipment | Other ITS Roadway Equipment | right-of-way request coordination | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate |
Any control flow has some confidentiality requirement, as observation of the flow may enable an attacker to analyze and learn how to assume control. MODERATE for most flows as the potential damage is likely contained, though anything that could have a significant safety impact may be assigned HIGH. | Since this directly impacts device control, we consider it the same as a control flow. Control flows, even for seemingly innocent devices, should have MODERATE integrity at minimum, just to guarantee that intended control messages are received. Incorrect, corrupted, intercepted and modified control messages can or will result in target field devices not behaving according to operator intent. The severity of this depends on the type of device, which is why some devices are set MODERATE and some HIGH. | Since this directly impacts device control, we consider it the same as a control flow. Control flow availability is related to the criticality of being able to remotely control the device. For most devices, this is MODERATE. For purely passive devices with no incident relationship, this will be LOW. All devices should have default modes that enable them to operate without backhaul connectivity, so no device warrants a HIGH. | |||
ITS Roadway Equipment | Other ITS Roadway Equipment | signal control coordination | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate |
Any control flow has some confidentiality requirement, as observation of the flow may enable an attacker to analyze and learn how to assume control. MODERATE for most flows as the potential damage is likely contained, though anything that could have a significant safety impact may be assigned HIGH. | Since this directly impacts device control, we consider it the same as a control flow. Control flows, even for seemingly innocent devices, should have MODERATE integrity at minimum, just to guarantee that intended control messages are received. Incorrect, corrupted, intercepted and modified control messages can or will result in target field devices not behaving according to operator intent. The severity of this depends on the type of device, which is why some devices are set MODERATE and some HIGH. | Since this directly impacts device control, we consider it the same as a control flow. Control flow availability is related to the criticality of being able to remotely control the device. For most devices, this is MODERATE. For purely passive devices with no incident relationship, this will be LOW. All devices should have default modes that enable them to operate without backhaul connectivity, so no device warrants a HIGH. | |||
ITS Roadway Equipment | Other ITS Roadway Equipment | traffic detector coordination | Moderate | Moderate | Low |
Any control flow has some confidentiality requirement, as observation of the flow may enable an attacker to analyze and learn how to assume control. MODERATE for most flows as the potential damage is likely contained, though anything that could have a significant safety impact may be assigned HIGH. | Since this directly impacts device control, we consider it the same as a control flow. Control flows, even for seemingly innocent devices, should have MODERATE integrity at minimum, just to guarantee that intended control messages are received. Incorrect, corrupted, intercepted and modified control messages can or will result in target field devices not behaving according to operator intent. The severity of this depends on the type of device, which is why some devices are set MODERATE and some HIGH. | Since this directly impacts device control, we consider it the same as a control flow. Control flow availability is related to the criticality of being able to remotely control the device. For most devices, this is MODERATE. For purely passive devices with no incident relationship, this will be LOW. All devices should have default modes that enable them to operate without backhaul connectivity, so no device warrants a HIGH. | |||
ITS Roadway Equipment | Other ITS Roadway Equipment | video surveillance coordination | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate |
Any control flow has some confidentiality requirement, as observation of the flow may enable an attacker to analyze and learn how to assume control. MODERATE for most flows as the potential damage is likely contained, though anything that could have a significant safety impact may be assigned HIGH. | Since this directly impacts device control, we consider it the same as a control flow. Control flows, even for seemingly innocent devices, should have MODERATE integrity at minimum, just to guarantee that intended control messages are received. Incorrect, corrupted, intercepted and modified control messages can or will result in target field devices not behaving according to operator intent. The severity of this depends on the type of device, which is why some devices are set MODERATE and some HIGH. | Since this directly impacts device control, we consider it the same as a control flow. Control flow availability is related to the criticality of being able to remotely control the device. For most devices, this is MODERATE. For purely passive devices with no incident relationship, this will be LOW. All devices should have default modes that enable them to operate without backhaul connectivity, so no device warrants a HIGH. | |||
ITS Roadway Equipment | Pedestrian | crossing permission | Not Applicable | High | Low |
This data is intentionally transmitted to everyone via a broadcast. | Although pedestrians have a responsibility to make sure the road is safe before they cross, they may react instinctively to incorrect information and be led to cross at unsafe times if they get incorrect information. Also, if the traffic signals are wrong and an accident happens, the pedestrian involved could sue, causing financial loss and other undesirable outcomes. | It is easy to tell whether this information flow is available and pedestrians are used to using crosswalks that do not provide this service. | |||
ITS Roadway Equipment | Traffic Management Center | rail crossing status | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate |
This information could be of interest to a malicious individual who is attempting to determine the best way to accomplish a crime. As such it would be best to not make it easily accessible. | If this is compromised, it could send unnecessary maintenance workers, or suggest actions that are incorrect for the true situation. | This information is important, but if it is not reported there are other safety systems that should prevent related incidents. The impact of any rail/road intersection is particularly high, but in this case a MODERATE rating can be justified by the alternative mechanisms. | |||
ITS Roadway Equipment | Traffic Management Center | right-of-way request notification | Low | Moderate | Moderate |
This can be reasonably guessed based on observing the ITS RE's environment. It is obvious when a bus approaches an intersection. | Invalid messages could lead to an unauthorized user gaining signal priority at an intersection. This could also be used to delay traffic, which could lead to a financial impact on the community. However, the traffic signal will have controls in place to ensure that it does not display an illegal configuration (such as green in every direction). | Even if all of the Right-of-way Requests are not passed along from an ITS RE, the intersection will still operate as normal. There are other existing methods to assist a right-of-way requesting vehicle safely traveling through an intersection, such as lights and sirens, which prevent this from being a HIGH. DISC: THEA and NYC believe this to be LOW: "not necessary for the app to work; can cope with not having immediately available data" | |||
ITS Roadway Equipment | Traffic Management Center | signal control status | Low | High | Moderate |
The current conditions of an ITS RE are completely observable, by design. | This influences the TMC response to a right-of-way request. It should be as accurate as the right-of-way request themselves. For some applications (ISIG) this need only be moderate. Per THEA: info needs to be accurate and should not be tampered to enable effective monitoring and control by the TMC. DISC: THEA believes this to be MODERATE: "info needs to be accurate and should not be tampered to enable effective monitoring and control by the TMC; should be as accurate as the right of way request". NYC:TMC doesn't play an active role in this application, i.e. even if the information contained in this flow were incorrect, it is unlikely to affect the outcome of this application one way or the other. On some applications NYC has this MODERATE though. RES: This value can obviously change a lot depending on the application context. | The TMC will need the current status of the ITS RE in order to make an educated decision. If it is unavailable, the system is unable to operate. However, a few missed messages will not have a catastrophic impact. From NYC: TMC doesn't play an active role in this application, i.e. even if it is unavailable, it is unlikely to affect the outcome of this application one way or the other. RES: This value can change a lot depending on the application context. | |||
ITS Roadway Equipment | Traffic Management Center | traffic detector data | Low | Moderate | Moderate |
No impact if someone sees the data | Some minimal guarantee of data integrity is necessary for all C-ITS flows. THEA believes this to be LOW.only limited adverse effect if raw/processed traffic detector data is bad/compromised; DISC: WYO believes this to be HIGH | Only limited adverse effect of info is not timely/readily available, however without this information it will be difficult to perform traffic management activities, thus MODERATE. If not used for management, may be LOW. | |||
ITS Roadway Equipment | Traffic Management Center | traffic image meta data | Low | Moderate | Moderate |
Traffic image data is generally intended for public consumption, and in any event is already video captured in the public arena, so this must be LOW. | While accuracy of this data is important for decision making purposes, applications should be able to cfunction without it. Thus MODERATE generally. | While accuracy of this data is important for decision making purposes, applications should be able to function without it. Thus MODERATE generally. | |||
ITS Roadway Equipment | Traffic Management Center | traffic images | Low | Moderate | Low |
Traffic image data is generally intended for public consumption, and in any event is already video captured in the public arena, so this must be LOW. | Generally transportation coordination information should be correct between source and destination, or inappropriate actions may be taken. | While useful, there is no signficant impact if this flow is not available. | |||
ITS Roadway Equipment | Wayside Equipment | rail crossing operational status | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate |
This information could be of interest to a malicious individual who is attempting to determine the best way to accomplish a crime. As such it would be best to not make it easily accessible. | If this is compromised, it could send unnecessary maintenance workers, or suggest actions that are incorrect for the true situation. | This information is important, but if it is not reported there are other safety systems that should prevent related incidents. The impact of any rail/road intersection is particularly high, but in this case a MODERATE rating can be justified by the alternative mechanisms. | |||
MMV User | ITS Roadway Equipment | crossing call | Not Applicable | High | Low |
The "Not Applicable" group includes information flows that do not actually carry information; for example, flows that represent the physical environment. | Although pedestrians have a responsibility to make sure the road is safe before they cross, and should ensure that they are detected by pedestrian detection systems, they may not always be detected and be led to cross at unsafe times if the ITS RE obtains incorrect information. | It is easy to tell whether this information flow is available and pedestrians are used to using crosswalks that do not provide this service. | |||
Other ITS Roadway Equipment | ITS Roadway Equipment | right-of-way request coordination | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate |
Any control flow has some confidentiality requirement, as observation of the flow may enable an attacker to analyze and learn how to assume control. MODERATE for most flows as the potential damage is likely contained, though anything that could have a significant safety impact may be assigned HIGH. | Since this directly impacts device control, we consider it the same as a control flow. Control flows, even for seemingly innocent devices, should have MODERATE integrity at minimum, just to guarantee that intended control messages are received. Incorrect, corrupted, intercepted and modified control messages can or will result in target field devices not behaving according to operator intent. The severity of this depends on the type of device, which is why some devices are set MODERATE and some HIGH. | Since this directly impacts device control, we consider it the same as a control flow. Control flow availability is related to the criticality of being able to remotely control the device. For most devices, this is MODERATE. For purely passive devices with no incident relationship, this will be LOW. All devices should have default modes that enable them to operate without backhaul connectivity, so no device warrants a HIGH. | |||
Other ITS Roadway Equipment | ITS Roadway Equipment | signal control coordination | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate |
Any control flow has some confidentiality requirement, as observation of the flow may enable an attacker to analyze and learn how to assume control. MODERATE for most flows as the potential damage is likely contained, though anything that could have a significant safety impact may be assigned HIGH. | Since this directly impacts device control, we consider it the same as a control flow. Control flows, even for seemingly innocent devices, should have MODERATE integrity at minimum, just to guarantee that intended control messages are received. Incorrect, corrupted, intercepted and modified control messages can or will result in target field devices not behaving according to operator intent. The severity of this depends on the type of device, which is why some devices are set MODERATE and some HIGH. | Since this directly impacts device control, we consider it the same as a control flow. Control flow availability is related to the criticality of being able to remotely control the device. For most devices, this is MODERATE. For purely passive devices with no incident relationship, this will be LOW. All devices should have default modes that enable them to operate without backhaul connectivity, so no device warrants a HIGH. | |||
Other ITS Roadway Equipment | ITS Roadway Equipment | traffic detector coordination | Moderate | Moderate | Low |
Any control flow has some confidentiality requirement, as observation of the flow may enable an attacker to analyze and learn how to assume control. MODERATE for most flows as the potential damage is likely contained, though anything that could have a significant safety impact may be assigned HIGH. | Since this directly impacts device control, we consider it the same as a control flow. Control flows, even for seemingly innocent devices, should have MODERATE integrity at minimum, just to guarantee that intended control messages are received. Incorrect, corrupted, intercepted and modified control messages can or will result in target field devices not behaving according to operator intent. The severity of this depends on the type of device, which is why some devices are set MODERATE and some HIGH. | Since this directly impacts device control, we consider it the same as a control flow. Control flow availability is related to the criticality of being able to remotely control the device. For most devices, this is MODERATE. For purely passive devices with no incident relationship, this will be LOW. All devices should have default modes that enable them to operate without backhaul connectivity, so no device warrants a HIGH. | |||
Other ITS Roadway Equipment | ITS Roadway Equipment | video surveillance coordination | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate |
Any control flow has some confidentiality requirement, as observation of the flow may enable an attacker to analyze and learn how to assume control. MODERATE for most flows as the potential damage is likely contained, though anything that could have a significant safety impact may be assigned HIGH. | Since this directly impacts device control, we consider it the same as a control flow. Control flows, even for seemingly innocent devices, should have MODERATE integrity at minimum, just to guarantee that intended control messages are received. Incorrect, corrupted, intercepted and modified control messages can or will result in target field devices not behaving according to operator intent. The severity of this depends on the type of device, which is why some devices are set MODERATE and some HIGH. | Since this directly impacts device control, we consider it the same as a control flow. Control flow availability is related to the criticality of being able to remotely control the device. For most devices, this is MODERATE. For purely passive devices with no incident relationship, this will be LOW. All devices should have default modes that enable them to operate without backhaul connectivity, so no device warrants a HIGH. | |||
Pedestrian | ITS Roadway Equipment | crossing call | Not Applicable | High | Low |
The "Not Applicable" group includes information flows that do not actually carry information; for example, flows that represent the physical environment. | Although pedestrians have a responsibility to make sure the road is safe before they cross, and should ensure that they are detected by pedestrian detection systems, they may not always be detected and be led to cross at unsafe times if the ITS RE obtains incorrect information. | It is easy to tell whether this information flow is available and pedestrians are used to using crosswalks that do not provide this service. | |||
Traffic Management Center | ITS Roadway Equipment | rail crossing control data | Moderate | High | Moderate |
Control flows, even for seemingly innocent devices, should be kept confidential to minimize attack vectors. While an individual installation may not be particularly impacted by a cyberattack of its sensor network, another installation might be severely impacted, and different installations are likely to use similar methods, so compromising one leads to compromising all. | Control flows, even for seemingly innocent devices, should have MODERATE integrity at minimum, just to guarantee that intended control messages are received. Incorrect, corrupted, intercepted and modified control messages can or will result in target field devices not behaving according to operator intent. The severity of this depends on the type of device, which is why some devices are set MODERATE and some HIGH. | Control flow availability is related to the criticality of being able to remotely control the device. For most devices, this is MODERATE. For purely passive devices with no incident relationship, this will be LOW. All devices should have default modes that enable them to operate without backhaul connectivity, so no device warrants a HIGH. | |||
Traffic Management Center | ITS Roadway Equipment | rail crossing request | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate |
This information could be of interest to a malicious individual who is attempting to determine the best way to accomplish a crime. As such it would be best to not make it easily accessible. | If this is compromised, it could send unnecessary maintenance workers, or suggest actions that are incorrect for the true situation. | This information is important, but if it is not reported there are other safety systems that should prevent related incidents. The impact of any rail/road intersection is particularly high, but in this case a MODERATE rating can be justified by the alternative mechanisms. | |||
Traffic Management Center | ITS Roadway Equipment | signal control commands | Moderate | High | Moderate |
Control flows, even for seemingly innocent devices, should be kept confidential to minimize attack vectors. While an individual installation may not be particularly impacted by a cyberattack of its sensor network, another installation might be severely impacted, and different installations are likely to use similar methods, so compromising one leads to compromising all. DISC: NYC believes this to be LOW: "The result of this will be directly observable." | Invalid messages could lead to an unauthorized user gaining control of an intersection. This could also be used to bring traffic to a standstill, which could lead to a large financial impact on the community. DISC: NYC believes this to be MODERATE: The signal timing is critical to the intersection operation; incorrect signal timing can lead to significant congestion and unreliable operation; while unsafe operation is controlled by the cabinet monitoring system, attackers could "freeze" the signal or call a preemption. RES: This will vary depending on the application and implementation. | These messages are important to help with preemption and signal priority applications. Without them, these applications mayl not work. However, if these signals are not received, the ITS RE will continue to function using its default configuration. The TMC should have an acknowledgement of the receipt of a message. DISC: NYC blieves this to be LOW: TMC doesn't play an active role in this application, i.e. even if it is unavailable, it is unlikely to affect the outcome of this application one way or the other. RES: This will vary depending on the application and implementation. |
|||
Traffic Management Center | ITS Roadway Equipment | traffic detector control | Moderate | Moderate | Low |
Control flows, even for seemingly innocent devices, should be kept confidential to minimize attack vectors. While an individual installation may not be particularly impacted by a cyberattack of its sensor network, another installation might be severely impacted, and different installations are likely to use similar methods, so compromising one leads to compromising all. DISC: THEA, WYO believe this to be LOW: encrypted, authenticated, proprietary; but should not cause severe damage if seen | Control flows, even for seemingly innocent devices, should have MODERATE integrity at minimum, just to guarantee that intended control messages are received. Incorrect, corrupted, intercepted and modified control messages can or will result in target field devices not behaving according to operator intent. The severity of this depends on the type of device, which is why some devices are set MODERATE and some HIGH.. From THEA: should be accurate and not be tampered with; could enable outside control of traffic sensors but should not cause severe harm, but could cause issues with traffic sensor data received and be detrimental to operations | Control flow availability is related to the criticality of being able to remotely control the device. For most devices, this is MODERATE. For purely passive devices with no incident relationship, this will be LOW. All devices should have default modes that enable them to operate without backhaul connectivity, so no device warrants a HIGH.. From THEA: want updates but delayed information will not be severe; should be able to operate from a previous/default control/config. DISC: WYO believes this to be MODERATE | |||
Traffic Management Center | ITS Roadway Equipment | video surveillance control | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate |
Control flows, even for seemingly innocent devices, should be kept confidential to minimize attack vectors. While an individual installation may not be particularly impacted by a cyberattack of its sensor network, another installation might be severely impacted, and different installations are likely to use similar methods, so compromising one leads to compromising all. | Control flows, even for seemingly innocent devices, should have MODERATE integrity at minimum, just to guarantee that intended control messages are received. Incorrect, corrupted, intercepted and modified control messages can or will result in target field devices not behaving according to operator intent. The severity of this depends on the type of device, which is why some devices are set MODERATE and some HIGH. | Control flow availability is related to the criticality of being able to remotely control the device. For most devices, this is MODERATE. For purely passive devices with no incident relationship, this will be LOW. All devices should have default modes that enable them to operate without backhaul connectivity, so no device warrants a HIGH. | |||
Traffic Management Center | Rail Operations Center | rail crossing advisories | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate |
May contain sensitive information about the highway-rail intersection area. If intercepted by a third party, could be used to embarras the relevant stakeholders, or as contributing information toward target selection (if for example a piece of monitoring equipment was listed as non-functional). | This will trigger maintenance activity, so it must be correct or such activities will not be properly scheduled and resources suboptimally assgned. If unavailable or modified, may negatively contribute to mobility and safety. | This will trigger maintenance activity, so it must be correct or such activities will not be properly scheduled and resources suboptimally assgned. If unavailable or modified, may negatively contribute to mobility and safety. | |||
Wayside Equipment | ITS Roadway Equipment | track status | Low | Moderate | Moderate |
Track status is typically physically viewable information. | This information is important, but if it is incorrect there are other safety systems that should prevent related incidents. The impact of any rail/road intersection is particularly high, but in this case a MODERATE rating can be justified by the alternative mechanisms. | This information is important, but if it is not reported there are other safety systems that should prevent related incidents. The impact of any rail/road intersection is particularly high, but in this case a MODERATE rating can be justified by the alternative mechanisms. |
Standards
The following table lists the standards associated with physical objects in this service package. For standards related to interfaces, see the specific information flow triple pages.
Name | Title | Physical Object |
---|---|---|
ITE 5201 ATC | Advanced Transportation Controller | ITS Roadway Equipment |
ITE 5202 ATC Model 2070 | Model 2070 Controller Standard | ITS Roadway Equipment |
ITE 5301 ATC ITS Cabinet | Intelligent Transportation System Standard Specification for Roadside Cabinets | ITS Roadway Equipment |
ITE 5401 ATC API | Application Programming Interface Standard for the Advanced Transportation Controller | ITS Roadway Equipment |
NEMA TS 8 Cyber and Physical Security | Cyber and Physical Security for Intelligent Transportation Systems | ITS Roadway Equipment |
Traffic Management Center | ||
NEMA TS2 Traffic Controller Assemblies | Traffic Controller Assemblies with NTCIP Requirements | ITS Roadway Equipment |
System Requirements
System Requirement | Need | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | The system shall collect highway-rail intersection (HRI) equipment operational status including both the current state or mode of operation and the current equipment condition. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
002 | The system shall monitor, analyze, and distribute traffic images from CCTV systems under remote control of the center. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
003 | The system shall implement pre-preemption adjustments to signal timing at adjacent intersections to accommodate a signal preemption. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
004 | The system shall collect and process, traffic sensor data in the vicinity of a highway-rail intersection (HRI). | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
005 | The system shall implement pre-preemption adjustments to signal timing at adjacent intersections to accommodate a signal preemption. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
006 | The system shall monitor the status of the highway-rail intersection (HRI) equipment, including both the current state and mode of operation and the current equipment condition, to be forwarded on to the traffic management center. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
007 | The system shall remotely control traffic signal controllers. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
008 | The system shall accept notifications of pedestrian calls. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
009 | The system shall monitor the status of the highway-rail intersection (HRI) equipment, including both the current state and mode of operation and the current equipment condition, to be forwarded on to the rail wayside equipment. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
010 | The system shall collect traffic signal controller operational status and compare against the control information sent by the center. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
011 | The system shall receive track status from the rail wayside equipment that can be passed on to the traffic management center. This may include the current status of the tracks and whether a train is approaching. | 01 | Traffic Operations need to be able to warn drivers of crossing closures in time for the driver to take appropriate action. |
012 | The system shall collect, process, digitize, and send traffic sensor data (speed, volume, and occupancy) to the center for further analysis and storage, under center control. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
013 | The system shall collect pedestrian images and pedestrian sensor data, and respond to pedestrian crossing requests via display, audio signal, or other manner. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
014 | The system shall manage (define, store and modify) control plans to coordinate signalized intersections, to be engaged at the direction of center personnel or according to a daily schedule. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
015 | The system shall collect, process, and send traffic images to the center for further analysis and distribution. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
016 | The system shall return sensor and CCTV system operational status to the controlling center. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
017 | The system shall control the dynamic message signs (DMS) in the vicinity of a highway-rail intersection (HRI) to advise drivers, cyclists, and pedestrians of approaching trains. | 01 | Traffic Operations need to be able to warn drivers of crossing closures in time for the driver to take appropriate action. |
018 | The system shall implement control plans to coordinate signalized intersections based on data from sensors. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
019 | The system shall implement pre-preemption adjustments to signal timing when notified of preemption status changes at adjacent intersections. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
020 | The system shall maintain traffic signal coordination including synchronizing clocks throughout the system. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
021 | The system shall close the highway-rail intersection (HRI) when a train is approaching using gates, lights/signs, barriers, and traffic control signals. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
022 | The system shall adjust signal timing in respond to a signal prioritization, signal preemption, pedestrian call, multi-modal crossing activation, or other requests for right-of-way. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
023 | The system shall support the integrated control of adjacent traffic signals to clear an area in advance of an approaching train and to manage traffic around the intersection. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
024 | The system shall forward rail traffic advisories received from the Wayside Equipment to the traffic management center. | 01 | Traffic Operations need to be able to warn drivers of crossing closures in time for the driver to take appropriate action. |
025 | The system shall control traffic signals under center control. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
026 | The system shall implement pre-preemption adjustments to signal timing when notified of preemption status changes at adjacent intersections. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
027 | The system shall respond to pedestrian crossing requests by accommodating the pedestrian crossing. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
028 | The system shall provide the capability to notify the traffic management center of pedestrian calls and pedestrian accommodations. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
029 | The system shall report the current signal control information to the center. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
030 | The system shall report current preemption status to the center. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
031 | The system shall return traffic signal controller operational status to the center. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |
032 | The system shall receive requests for emergency vehicle signal preemption. | 02 | Traffic Operations need to be able to modify traffic signal timing in order to allow safe and efficient movement of vehicles away or towards a highway rail intersection when a train is approaching. |